Company Presents an Early Cost Estimate

The Boring Company outlined a roughly 10-mile underground connection between downtown Nashville and the airport. Chief Development Officer Jim Fitzgerald put the estimated cost of two tunnels at $240 million to $300 million during a Rotary Club of Nashville presentation.

That figure is a company estimate, not a completed-project cost. A meaningful comparison with other transit projects requires details about stations, vehicles, land, utilities, safety systems, financing, operations and the scope included in each estimate.

How the Rail Comparison Is Framed

TBC says its in-house tunneling approach can cost less than conventional tunneled transit. Nashville’s rejected 2018 transportation plan had a much broader scope, so its total price is not a direct like-for-like comparison with an airport tunnel.

The company and state officials also describe construction as privately funded. Final agreements will determine the allocation of construction, maintenance, operating and infrastructure-modification costs.

Broadway Testing

Geotechnical drilling on Broadway is collecting information about rock and subsurface conditions. The testing may inform design decisions but does not establish an approved route or construction schedule.

Engineering and Operations

The concept calls for passengers to travel in electric vehicles through dedicated tunnels. Project representatives have discussed waterproofing, pumps, elevated station elements and drainage as flood-mitigation measures.

Nashville’s karst geology, utilities and groundwater remain engineering considerations that must be addressed through final design, permitting and construction monitoring.

What Remains to Be Verified

The estimate will become easier to evaluate when final route and station plans, executed agreements, permit conditions and detailed cost responsibilities are public.

Ridership, travel-time and congestion effects will also require project-specific forecasts followed by operating data if the system opens.

Update: Airport terms added financial detail

In February 2026, the Metropolitan Nashville Airport Authority announced an agreement framework with The Boring Company. The authority said the company would fund construction and reimburse airport legal, engineering and administrative costs. It projected approximately $34 million in license fees and $309 million in passenger pickup and drop-off fees over a potential 50-year term.

Those airport projections add detail to the private-funding claim but do not validate the earlier $240 million to $300 million construction estimate. License revenue is different from project cost, and a decades-long revenue projection depends on the final agreement, opening date, passenger volume and fee structure.

What must be included in a cost comparison

A transparent estimate should state whether it includes both running tunnels, stations, launch and retrieval sites, vehicles, charging, ventilation, communications, fire-life-safety systems, utility relocation, land, design, insurance and contingency. Excluding major components can make a headline figure look lower without reducing the total resources needed to open the service.

Operating costs matter as well. Staffing, fleet replacement, electricity, maintenance, security, insurance and station upkeep continue after construction. A privately financed project can still use public rights-of-way and require government inspection or emergency coordination, so the allocation of those responsibilities should be visible in final agreements.

Benchmarks for later accountability

Once construction is farther along, readers should be able to compare the estimate with executed contracts, change orders and the scope actually delivered. After opening, cost per trip and annual operating performance will provide a stronger basis for comparison with buses, rail, taxis and ride-hailing than total construction figures alone.

The role of contingency

Early infrastructure estimates usually contain uncertainty because design, utilities and site conditions are not fully known. A credible estimate explains its contingency and the stage of design on which it is based. As engineering advances, the range should be updated rather than compared as though every version covers the same scope.

If the project remains privately financed, cost overruns would primarily concern the company and its investors, but schedule changes and construction impacts can still affect public property, airport access and nearby businesses. Financial risk and public disruption are related but separate questions.

SOURCES